Alumina-to-Kovar Sealing: Materials, CTE Matching, Brazing and Design Considerations

Alumina-to-Kovar sealing is a widely used approach for producing hermetic ceramic-to-metal assemblies in applications where electrical insulation, vacuum integrity, dimensional stability, and long-term reliability are important.

Alumina provides high electrical insulation, thermal stability, chemical resistance, and mechanical rigidity, while Kovar is a controlled-expansion nickel-iron-cobalt alloy commonly selected for joining with ceramics in hermetic assemblies.

However, producing a reliable alumina-to-Kovar seal is not simply a matter of putting the two materials together and applying brazing filler metal. The final joint depends on several interconnected factors:

  • Alumina grade and microstructure
  • Kovar alloy grade and material condition
  • Coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE)
  • Metallization system
  • Nickel plating
  • Braze alloy
  • Joint geometry
  • Surface preparation
  • Brazing atmosphere
  • Thermal cycle
  • Fixture design
  • Hermeticity requirements
  • Thermal and mechanical qualification

The combination of these factors determines whether the final assembly remains hermetic after brazing, thermal cycling, pressure changes, vibration, and long-term service.

This guide explains the engineering principles behind alumina-to-Kovar sealing, compares conventional Mo-Mn metallization with active brazing, and provides a practical framework for designing and sourcing custom ceramic-to-metal assemblies.

  1. What Is Alumina-to-Kovar Sealing?

Alumina-to-Kovar sealing is a ceramic-to-metal joining process used to create a mechanically bonded and, when required, hermetic interface between an alumina ceramic component and a Kovar metal component.

A typical conventional structure can be represented as:

Alumina Ceramic → Mo-Mn Metallization → Nickel Plating → Braze Alloy → Kovar

The metallization provides a brazeable metallic surface on the ceramic. Nickel plating can improve the metallized surface for subsequent brazing, while the braze alloy forms the final metallic joint with the Kovar component.

A published study of the Mo-Mn process for alumina and Kovar reported a multilayer structure consisting of ceramic, an intermediate region, Mo-Mn metallization, nickel plating, hard solder, nickel plating, and Kovar. The study associated infiltration and interdiffusion within the metallization region with strong and vacuum-tight sealing.

The exact layer structure, materials, and processing conditions should nevertheless be developed for the specific ceramic grade, Kovar grade, geometry, and performance requirements.

  1. Why Are Alumina and Kovar Used Together?

The alumina-Kovar material combination is particularly useful when an assembly needs both electrical insulation and a metal interface suitable for hermetic construction.

Alumina ceramic provides:

  • High electrical insulation
  • High dielectric strength
  • Good thermal stability
  • High hardness
  • Chemical resistance
  • Low electrical loss in suitable applications
  • Good dimensional stability
  • Compatibility with vacuum and high-temperature environments when properly processed

Kovar provides:

  • Controlled thermal expansion
  • Good machinability compared with many refractory metals
  • Compatibility with established ceramic sealing technologies
  • Good brazing and welding characteristics when properly prepared
  • A practical metal interface for hermetic packages and feedthroughs

The important point is that Kovar is not selected simply because it is easy to braze. Its controlled-expansion behavior is a major part of the material-selection strategy.

  1. Understanding Kovar and Its CTE

Kovar is a controlled-expansion nickel-iron-cobalt alloy commonly used where thermal-expansion compatibility with glass or ceramic materials is important.

For ceramic-to-metal sealing, the coefficient of thermal expansion is critical because the ceramic and metal experience different dimensional changes during heating and cooling.

Consider a simplified thermal cycle:

Room Temperature → Brazing Temperature → Cooling → Room Temperature

During heating:

  • Alumina expands.
  • Kovar expands.
  • The braze layer becomes molten or plastic depending on the process.
  • The joint geometry changes.

During cooling:

  • The materials contract.
  • The braze solidifies.
  • Residual stresses develop.

If the thermal-expansion behavior is poorly matched, these stresses can contribute to:

  • Ceramic cracking
  • Interface separation
  • Metallization failure
  • Braze cracking
  • Leakage
  • Long-term fatigue

Therefore, CTE matching should be evaluated across the actual operating and processing temperature ranges, rather than using a single room-temperature value as a complete design criterion.

  1. Is Kovar a Perfect CTE Match for Alumina?

No.

It is more accurate to describe Kovar as a controlled-expansion alloy that can provide favorable thermal-expansion compatibility with ceramic materials when the specific material pair and joint design are properly engineered.

The actual performance depends on:

  • Kovar grade
  • Heat treatment
  • Temperature range
  • Alumina composition
  • Ceramic geometry
  • Joint dimensions
  • Braze thickness
  • Metallization structure
  • Thermal cycle

Research on alumina-to-Kovar joining has demonstrated that processing parameters and material conditions can affect the resulting joint. For example, studies of active brazing have investigated alumina preparation, Kovar heat treatment, titanium content, brazing cycles, and fixture design as factors affecting hermetic joint consistency.

This is why a reliable supplier should evaluate the complete material system, rather than selecting Kovar based only on a nominal CTE number.

  1. Selecting the Right Alumina Ceramic

Not all alumina ceramics behave identically during ceramic-to-metal sealing.

Common alumina categories include approximately:

  • 90% alumina
  • 94% alumina
  • 96% alumina
  • 99% alumina
  • 99.5% alumina
  • 99.9% alumina

The appropriate grade depends on the application.

For electrical feedthroughs

Important considerations may include:

  • Dielectric performance
  • Insulation resistance
  • Mechanical strength
  • Dimensional requirements
  • Operating temperature

For vacuum applications

Additional considerations include:

  • Porosity
  • Outgassing
  • Surface condition
  • Cleaning compatibility
  • Thermal cycling
  • Hermeticity

For high-temperature applications

Consider:

  • Alumina purity
  • Grain structure
  • Thermal shock
  • Mechanical strength at temperature
  • Thermal-expansion behavior

Higher-purity alumina is not automatically the correct choice for every design. The ceramic grade should be selected according to the complete performance specification.

  1. Conventional Alumina-to-Kovar Sealing Using Mo-Mn Metallization

The Mo-Mn metallization process is one of the established technologies for alumina-to-metal hermetic sealing.

A simplified process is:

Alumina machining → Cleaning → Mo-Mn metallization → High-temperature firing → Nickel plating → Braze assembly → Brazing → Inspection → Hermeticity testing

The Mo-Mn layer creates a metallic surface on the alumina that can subsequently be nickel plated and brazed.

A classic study of alumina-to-Kovar seals described the process as metallization, nickel plating, and subsequent hard soldering. It also identified a multilayer sealing structure between alumina and Kovar.

Why use Mo-Mn?

The process can provide:

  • A well-established alumina metallization route
  • A suitable surface for nickel plating
  • A brazeable interface
  • Strong ceramic-metal adhesion
  • A pathway to hermetic sealing

The exact metallization composition and firing conditions are process-specific and should be established through qualification rather than copied from a generic recipe.

  1. Typical Mo-Mn Alumina-to-Kovar Structure

A simplified cross-section can be represented as:

Kovar

Braze Alloy

Nickel Plating

Mo-Mn Metallization

Alumina Ceramic

In some systems, additional reaction or intermediate layers can develop between the alumina and metallization.

The final interface is therefore not simply:

Ceramic + Metal

Instead, it is a multi-material interface engineered to manage wetting, adhesion, thermal stress, and hermeticity.

This distinction is important when evaluating cross-sectional microstructure and failure mechanisms.

  1. Why Nickel Plating Is Used

After Mo-Mn metallization, nickel plating is commonly used before brazing.

The nickel layer can provide a more suitable metallic surface for subsequent joining and can influence:

  • Braze wetting
  • Surface chemistry
  • Metallization protection
  • Joint consistency
  • Braze compatibility

The classic Mo-Mn process for alumina-to-Kovar sealing described nickel plating between the metallized ceramic and the hard solder.

Nickel thickness should be controlled according to the actual metallization system and brazing process. It should not be treated as a universal fixed value for every application.

  1. Choosing the Braze Alloy

Braze selection is one of the most important decisions in alumina-to-Kovar sealing.

Potential braze families include:

  • Silver-based brazes
  • Silver-copper brazes
  • Silver-copper-titanium active brazes
  • Gold-based brazes
  • Other application-specific high-temperature brazing systems

The correct selection depends on:

  • Brazing temperature
  • Ceramic compatibility
  • Metallization system
  • Kovar condition
  • Required hermeticity
  • Operating temperature
  • Vacuum compatibility
  • Mechanical requirements
  • Electrical requirements
  • Cost and production volume

For example, conventional Mo-Mn metallization can be followed by a conventional braze, while active brazing can allow selected alumina-to-Kovar combinations to be joined without prior metallization.

  1. Active Brazing of Alumina to Kovar

Active brazing is an alternative joining route in which a reactive element, commonly titanium, is incorporated into the braze alloy.

The reactive element promotes wetting and bonding to ceramic surfaces.

Research has demonstrated direct active brazing of un-metallized alumina to Kovar using Ag-Cu-based active filler metals containing titanium. The study specifically investigated the effects of alumina preparation, Kovar heat treatment, titanium content, brazing cycle, and fixture design, with helium leak detection used to evaluate hermeticity.

A separate study investigated 99.9% alumina and 4J33 Kovar using a Ni-Ti interlayer and reported an airtight joint under its experimental conditions.

Advantages of active brazing may include:

  • Direct joining of selected ceramic surfaces
  • Elimination of a conventional Mo-Mn metallization step in some designs
  • Potentially simplified processing
  • Suitability for certain high-purity alumina applications

Limitations include:

  • Reactive interface formation
  • Sensitivity to braze composition
  • Sensitivity to surface preparation
  • Process-window requirements
  • Potential formation of brittle reaction phases
  • Need for application-specific qualification

Therefore, active brazing should not automatically be considered a replacement for Mo-Mn metallization.

  1. Mo-Mn vs Active Brazing
FactorMo-Mn + Nickel + BrazeActive Brazing
Ceramic metallizationRequiredMay not be required
Alumina compatibilityWell-establishedApplication-dependent
Process stepsMorePotentially fewer
Braze surfaceMetallized/Ni-platedReactive ceramic interface
Process sensitivityMetallization + brazingActive-element reaction + brazing
High-purity aluminaOften requires careful metallization processCan be attractive in selected cases
Production qualificationWell-established routeStrongly process-dependent
HermeticityCan be excellent when properly controlledCan be excellent when properly controlled
Best selection methodEstablished process + qualificationApplication-specific evaluation

The appropriate route should be selected based on the complete assembly rather than the number of process steps alone.

  1. Joint Geometry Matters

Even when the material combination is correct, poor geometry can create excessive stress.

Important design parameters include:

  • Ceramic wall thickness
  • Kovar wall thickness
  • Joint width
  • Metallization band width
  • Braze layer geometry
  • Corner radius
  • Hole diameter
  • Pin diameter
  • Clearance
  • Load direction
  • Thermal gradients

Sharp ceramic corners can create local stress concentrations.

Thin ceramic sections may also be more sensitive to thermal and mechanical stress.

A good design therefore tries to avoid creating a situation where the ceramic must absorb large localized stresses during brazing or operation.

  1. Design the Metallization Area Carefully

The metallized area should provide sufficient surface for brazing without unnecessarily increasing the stress-sensitive region.

Important considerations include:

Metallization width

The metallization must be wide enough to accommodate the intended braze joint and manufacturing tolerances.

Edge distance

The metallization should be positioned so that processing and thermal stresses do not concentrate directly at a vulnerable ceramic edge.

Thickness uniformity

Non-uniform metallization can affect:

  • Plating
  • Wetting
  • Braze flow
  • Joint thickness
  • Local stress

Surface condition

Contamination, oxidation, particles, or poor adhesion can compromise the final joint.

  1. Kovar Surface Preparation

Kovar preparation is equally important.

Potential preparation steps may include:

  1. Machining
  2. Degreasing
  3. Cleaning
  4. Oxide removal or controlled surface treatment
  5. Plating if required
  6. Inspection
  7. Brazing

The exact treatment depends on the Kovar grade, braze alloy, furnace atmosphere, and assembly design.

The Kovar surface must be compatible with the selected brazing process. Excessive oxidation or contamination can reduce wetting and increase the probability of joint defects.

  1. Brazing Atmosphere and Thermal Cycle

The brazing atmosphere can significantly influence joint quality.

Depending on the process, brazing may be performed under:

  • Vacuum
  • Controlled inert atmosphere
  • Hydrogen-containing atmosphere
  • Other application-specific controlled environments

The thermal cycle must consider:

  • Heating rate
  • Preheating
  • Braze melting range
  • Holding time
  • Cooling rate
  • Furnace uniformity
  • Fixture constraints

The objective is not simply to melt the braze.

The entire assembly must be exposed to a controlled thermal cycle that allows the braze to flow and wet the intended surfaces while limiting unwanted thermal stress and interfacial reactions.

  1. Fixture Design Is Part of the Process

Fixture design is sometimes underestimated in ceramic-to-metal brazing.

A fixture can affect:

  • Component alignment
  • Joint clearance
  • Ceramic stress
  • Braze flow
  • Thermal gradients
  • Distortion
  • Repeatability

Research on active alumina-to-Kovar brazing specifically identified fixture design as one of the process variables affecting consistent hermetic joints.

For production assemblies, fixtures should therefore be considered part of the joining process rather than merely a positioning accessory.

  1. Hermeticity Testing

For applications involving vacuum, gas containment, or protected electronic environments, mechanical bond strength alone is not enough.

The completed assembly may need helium leak testing.

A typical qualification sequence can include:

Brazing → Cleaning → Visual Inspection → Dimensional Inspection → Helium Leak Test → Electrical Test → Thermal Cycling → Re-Test

Helium leak detection is widely used for evaluating hermetic ceramic-to-metal assemblies, including alumina-to-Kovar joints.

The acceptable leak rate should be defined by the application or customer specification rather than using one universal value.

  1. Thermal Cycling and Reliability

A seal can pass an initial leak test and still require additional qualification.

Why?

Because the completed assembly may experience repeated temperature changes during service.

Thermal cycling can expose weaknesses in:

  • Ceramic/metallization adhesion
  • Metallization/plating interface
  • Plating/braze interface
  • Braze/Kovar interface
  • Ceramic itself

A suitable qualification plan may therefore include:

  • Initial helium leak test
  • Thermal cycling
  • Visual inspection
  • Dimensional inspection
  • Final helium leak test
  • Cross-sectional analysis of representative samples
  • Electrical testing where applicable

The specific cycle count and temperature range should be defined by the intended application.

  1. Common Alumina-to-Kovar Seal Failure Modes

Understanding failure modes helps engineers identify the real cause of leakage.

19.1 Ceramic cracking

Possible causes:

  • Excessive thermal stress
  • Poor geometry
  • Excessive mechanical loading
  • Uneven heating or cooling
  • Fixture-induced stress

19.2 Metallization delamination

Possible causes:

  • Poor surface preparation
  • Incorrect metallization process
  • Inadequate firing
  • Ceramic contamination
  • Excessive thermal stress

19.3 Poor braze wetting

Possible causes:

  • Surface contamination
  • Incorrect atmosphere
  • Inappropriate braze alloy
  • Oxidized Kovar
  • Inadequate metallization/plating

19.4 Braze voids

Possible causes:

  • Poor braze placement
  • Inappropriate joint geometry
  • Gas entrapment
  • Improper thermal cycle

19.5 Leakage after thermal cycling

Possible causes:

  • Residual stress
  • Interfacial defects
  • Microcracking
  • Inadequate CTE compatibility
  • Joint geometry problems

The important lesson is that leakage is often a system-level failure rather than a simple braze-material problem.

  1. Alumina-to-Kovar Applications

The material combination is particularly relevant to hermetic electronic and industrial assemblies.

20.1 Hermetic Electronic Packages

Alumina can provide electrical insulation while Kovar provides a controlled-expansion metallic interface.

Potential applications include:

  • Hermetic electronic packages
  • Sensor packages
  • Electrical connectors
  • Instrumentation assemblies

20.2 Vacuum Feedthroughs

Alumina-to-Kovar construction can be used to pass electrical conductors through a vacuum boundary while maintaining insulation and hermeticity.

Typical applications include:

  • Vacuum equipment
  • High-vacuum systems
  • Scientific instruments
  • Semiconductor equipment
  • Electron-beam systems

20.3 High-Voltage Feedthroughs

Alumina is attractive for electrical insulation in high-voltage environments.

Design considerations include:

  • Dielectric strength
  • Creepage distance
  • Clearance
  • Triple-point geometry
  • Corona
  • Surface contamination
  • Thermal expansion
  • Hermeticity

20.4 RF and Microwave Assemblies

Ceramic-to-metal structures may also be used in RF and microwave equipment where electrical insulation, vacuum integrity, and controlled geometry are required.

20.5 Sensors and Instrumentation

Hermetic ceramic-metal assemblies can protect sensitive internal components from:

  • Moisture
  • Vacuum
  • Atmospheric contamination
  • Pressure differences
  • Harsh environments
  1. Alumina-to-Kovar Feedthrough Design

A typical ceramic feedthrough may contain:

Metal Housing / Kovar

Braze Joint

Metallized Alumina

Electrical Conductor

Depending on the design, the assembly may include:

  • Single electrical pin
  • Multi-pin configuration
  • Coaxial structure
  • High-voltage electrode
  • Thermocouple connection
  • RF conductor
  • High-current conductor

The final configuration should be optimized according to electrical, mechanical, thermal, and vacuum requirements.

Commercial ceramic feedthrough systems commonly use alumina with Kovar, nickel-iron alloys, stainless steel, nickel, copper, and other metal systems depending on application requirements.

  1. What Information Should Be Included in an RFQ?

When requesting an Alumina-to-Kovar seal from a manufacturer, providing only a drawing may not be enough.

A strong RFQ should include:

Ceramic

  • Alumina purity
  • Ceramic grade
  • Dimensions
  • Tolerances
  • Surface finish
  • Metallization requirements

Kovar

  • Alloy grade
  • Dimensions
  • Material condition
  • Plating requirements
  • Welding requirements

Brazing

  • Preferred braze alloy, if specified
  • Brazing atmosphere
  • Maximum process temperature
  • Joint geometry
  • Braze area

Performance

  • Required leak rate
  • Operating temperature
  • Thermal cycling requirements
  • Pressure/vacuum requirements
  • Electrical voltage
  • Insulation resistance
  • Mechanical load

Inspection

  • Helium leak testing
  • Dimensional inspection
  • Electrical testing
  • X-ray inspection
  • Metallization inspection
  • Cross-section analysis

The more complete the RFQ, the easier it is for the supplier to evaluate feasibility and provide a meaningful quotation.

  1. Custom Alumina-to-Kovar Assembly Development

For OEM projects, the most efficient approach is often to develop the ceramic, metallization, Kovar component, and brazing process as one integrated system.

A typical development workflow is:

Step 1: Application definition

Identify:

  • Vacuum level
  • Temperature
  • Voltage
  • Current
  • Mechanical loads
  • Environmental conditions

Step 2: Material selection

Select:

  • Alumina grade
  • Kovar grade
  • Metallization system
  • Nickel plating
  • Braze alloy

Step 3: Joint design

Optimize:

  • Ceramic geometry
  • Metallization area
  • Braze area
  • Joint clearance
  • Stress-relief geometry

Step 4: Prototype

Produce engineering samples and evaluate:

  • Brazing behavior
  • Dimensional stability
  • Joint microstructure
  • Hermeticity

Step 5: Qualification

Perform application-specific:

  • Leak testing
  • Thermal cycling
  • Mechanical testing
  • Electrical testing
  • Environmental testing

Step 6: Production

After process validation, establish:

  • Process parameters
  • Inspection criteria
  • Traceability
  • Batch control
  • Final acceptance testing
  1. How to Choose an Alumina-to-Kovar Seal Manufacturer

When evaluating suppliers, look beyond whether they can simply “braze ceramic to metal.”

A capable supplier should be able to discuss:

Ceramic capability

  • Alumina grades
  • Ceramic machining
  • Ceramic dimensional tolerances
  • Metallization

Metal capability

  • Kovar machining
  • Forming
  • Surface preparation
  • Plating

Joining capability

  • Mo-Mn metallization
  • Active brazing
  • Vacuum brazing
  • Controlled-atmosphere brazing

Inspection capability

  • Helium leak testing
  • Dimensional inspection
  • Electrical testing
  • Metallization inspection
  • Microscopy or cross-sectional analysis

Engineering capability

The supplier should also be able to identify potential problems before production, particularly:

  • CTE mismatch
  • Ceramic stress concentration
  • Metallization geometry
  • Braze clearance
  • Thermal-cycle risk

This is especially important for custom OEM components.

  1. Standard vs Custom Alumina-to-Kovar Seals

Standard products can be appropriate when:

  • Dimensions are already established
  • Application conditions are conventional
  • Required leak performance is standard
  • Electrical configuration is fixed

Custom components are preferable when the design involves:

  • Unusual dimensions
  • High voltage
  • UHV
  • High temperature
  • Multi-pin configurations
  • RF structures
  • Complex Kovar geometry
  • Tight dimensional tolerances
  • Special braze materials
  • Customer-specific qualification

For custom projects, early supplier involvement can reduce the risk of discovering manufacturability problems after the design is finalized.

  1. Frequently Asked Questions

What is an alumina-to-Kovar seal?

It is a ceramic-to-metal joint that connects alumina ceramic to Kovar alloy, often for hermetic electronic, vacuum, electrical, or instrumentation applications.

Why is Kovar used with alumina?

Kovar is a controlled-expansion alloy that can provide favorable thermal-expansion compatibility with alumina when the material pair and joint geometry are properly engineered.

Does alumina-to-Kovar sealing require Mo-Mn metallization?

Not always. The conventional approach often uses Mo-Mn metallization followed by nickel plating and brazing, while active brazing can directly join selected un-metallized alumina-to-Kovar combinations.

Is active brazing better than Mo-Mn?

Not universally. Active brazing may simplify some designs, but it introduces different interface reactions and process requirements. The correct method depends on the ceramic, Kovar, braze alloy, geometry, and application.

Can alumina-to-Kovar seals be hermetic?

Yes. Properly designed and manufactured alumina-to-Kovar assemblies can be used for hermetic applications. Hermeticity must be verified on the completed assembly using an appropriate leak-testing method.

Can alumina-to-Kovar assemblies be used in vacuum?

Yes. They can be designed for vacuum and high-vacuum applications, provided that materials, cleaning, brazing, outgassing, leak rate, and thermal requirements are appropriately controlled.

What alumina purity should be used?

There is no single universal grade. The appropriate alumina purity depends on electrical, mechanical, thermal, vacuum, and manufacturing requirements.

Can Kovar be welded after brazing?

In many assemblies, welding and brazing are combined as part of the manufacturing sequence. However, the exact sequence should be validated because subsequent welding can introduce thermal stress into the ceramic-to-metal joint.

  1. Key Design Principles

For reliable alumina-to-Kovar sealing, five principles are particularly important:

  1. Match the material system, not just the CTE values.
    Alumina, Kovar, metallization, plating, and braze alloy must be considered together.
  2. Select the joining technology according to the application.
    Mo-Mn metallization and active brazing each have appropriate application areas.
  3. Design the joint before finalizing the ceramic geometry.
    Joint location, thickness, clearance, corners, and metallization area can strongly affect reliability.
  4. Control the complete thermal cycle.
    Heating, brazing, and cooling can all influence residual stress.
  5. Test the finished assembly.
    For hermetic applications, the final assembly—not only the ceramic or braze material—must meet the specified leak and reliability requirements.
  6. Conclusion

Alumina-to-Kovar sealing is a mature but highly process-dependent ceramic-to-metal joining technology.

The combination of alumina ceramic and Kovar alloy can provide an effective solution for hermetic feedthroughs, electronic packages, vacuum components, high-voltage assemblies, RF components, sensors, and scientific equipment.

However, successful sealing depends on much more than choosing two compatible materials.

The complete system must be engineered around:

  • Alumina grade
  • Kovar grade
  • CTE behavior
  • Mo-Mn metallization or active brazing
  • Nickel plating
  • Braze alloy
  • Joint geometry
  • Surface preparation
  • Brazing atmosphere
  • Thermal cycle
  • Fixture design
  • Hermeticity requirements
  • Application-specific qualification

For OEM projects, a qualified ceramic-to-metal manufacturer should be involved early in the design process. This allows material selection, joint geometry, metallization, brazing, and inspection requirements to be developed together.

If you are sourcing custom alumina-to-Kovar seals, Kovar ceramic feedthroughs, hermetic ceramic assemblies, or metallized alumina components, providing the application conditions and engineering drawing allows the manufacturing process to be evaluated more accurately.

Request a Custom Alumina-to-Kovar Seal

For a custom project, provide:

  • Ceramic drawing
  • Kovar drawing
  • Alumina grade
  • Kovar grade
  • Required metallization
  • Braze requirements
  • Operating temperature
  • Vacuum or pressure requirements
  • Required helium leak rate
  • Electrical requirements
  • Annual quantity

A technical review can then determine the appropriate alumina material, Kovar alloy, metallization system, brazing process, joint geometry, and inspection plan for the application.